Speak Asia Judicial Victory
Dear SpeakAsians,
We have some MEGA updates to share with everyone - Some GREAT News..!!
As you all are aware that Mr Tarak Bajpai ( COO of Speak Asia ) had been detained by EOW for investigation purpose, and on 4th August the custody was increased further uptill 12th August. Today there was another court hearing and here are the updates:
- EOW could not find any substantial evidence against Speak Asia even after the remand was extended from 4th August to 12th August.
- There were many channels which were showing that EOW has found that Speak Asia does not have their clients - of-course today's court hearing proves it wrong.
- EOWs demand for another extension of Police Custody for 14 more days was denied by the Court.
- The Court has send Mr Tarak Bajpai and other detained officials into a Judicial Custody till 16th (as until 16th the court is closed)
- On 16th a Bail Application will be filed and there will be a court hearing on 16th - this hearing will not be a hearing on investigation but on the release of Mr Bajpai and other officials.
There are few more updates which we were dying to post but we are awaiting confirmation from our authentic sources , hence rest updates will be posted post authentication only.
We Want To Draw EVERYONE's attention to the point that its been 3 months 'people' started spreading rumors about Speak Asia and in last 3 months we have not seen ANY STRONG evidence against Speak Asia - Hence It Rings Bells & Questions In Everyone's Mind
- Why Are People Against Speak Asia ?
- Who All Are Against Speak Asia ?
- Who (apart from SpeakAsians) Are Fighting Against These People ?
"Difference between Judicial Custody and Police Custody : Please go through section 167 of Cr. P.C. The accused remains in the custody of Police. Police has physical control over accused. Police custody is given in non-bailable offenses, depending upon the circumstances of the case, to facilitate investigation. Police custody can not be given in bailable offenses. Whereas judicial custody means that the accused is technically in the custody of the Magistrate. Police can not interrogate a person in judicial custody without permission of the concerned Magistrate/court."
No comments:
Post a Comment